Can we get Y!A to start a "Skeptics" section for people like TR? I'm getting really sick and tired of seeing them around here.

Sharing information is part of how people grow and we don't need this hindered by people who put their own insecurity before the common good.

__________________
Yahoo!

Sharing information,I call it spreading superstition and silliness.Seriously go to Society and Culture the mythology section.I've never seen TR there you'll be safe.A skeptic section is a good idea.I'd welcome your answers.I'm secure enough to hear both sides of an issue.Feel free to bait me all you want too.I'm also secure enough to not hit that flag.

__________________
Yahoo!

no, although some do it to be a hindrance, some are legit so they have the right to their side of answering.
You don't need to be asking a question if you can't handle legitimate response from both sides.
What you have to do is to discern the difference between a skeptic view and someone baiting the topic section.
If you truly believe it is baiting to get a rise out of you, then just report it.

__________________
Yahoo!

Even if skeptics had a section they would just spend their time conspiring how to bait this section with spoof video's that waste people's time.

May I suggest that you use the report abuse button when the answers are both unhelpful and insulting.

It seems their rational, critical thinking skills can't stop their addiction to coming into the Alternative category of the Science & Mathematics section.

For the record I welcome positive critiques (these make suggestions for improved research or better procedures) but their religous zeal for attempting to influence people to not study subjects and eliminate imagination and creativity from science is disturbing to me.

Michael John Weaver, M.S.

__________________
Yahoo!

Even if skeptics had a section they would just spend their time conspiring how to bait this section with spoof video's that waste people's time.

May I suggest that you use the report abuse button when the answers are both unhelpful and insulting.

It seems their rational, critical thinking skills can't stop their addiction to coming into the Alternative category of the Science & Mathematics section.

For the record I welcome positive critiques (these make suggestions for improved research or better procedures) but their religous zeal for attempting to influence people to not study subjects and eliminate imagination and creativity from science is disturbing to me.

Michael John Weaver, M.S.

__________________
Yahoo!