Is Kosovo status representing the failure of NATO and USA?

vivet · #1 07-10-2007, 20:55

Shouldn't peace forces be established by independent, neutral countries, rather than by the aggressor?

alexlascari · #2 07-10-2007, 20:55

As "independent" are the aggesors' "peace forces" in Iraq. And as safeguarding and securing global peace and democracy Guantanamo and its branches are.

lordkelvin · #3 07-10-2007, 20:55

In what way? Surely you know that there is more than one side influencing what is going on over there.

gcbtrading · #4 07-10-2007, 20:56

The status of Kosovo is being determined by the United Nations.
NATO, and the USA succeeded in ending the genocide in Kosovo.

Dellarovere · #5 07-10-2007, 20:57

It's not a failure of NATO and USA. It's a success of them, as they materialize their plans, allowing or even encouraging the Albanian genocide against Serbs, the way they did with the Bosnian crimes agaist Serbes.

conranger1 · #6 07-10-2007, 20:59

No! its the result of the failure of Serbia to treat others as equals, but, then again what would you expect from the country that got away scot-free from starting World War 1 by the assassination of the Emperor of Austro-Hungaria nephew and his wife.

Alternativa Teme
Tregoni Versionin e Pritueshem Dergojeni kete faqe me Email
Vleresojeni kete Teme
Vleresojeni kete Teme: